Protopie vs. Figma: Best Prototyping Tool 2024

As the design landscape evolved, prototyping emerged as a vital step, providing dynamic previews of concepts before development.

Protopie and Figma, two leading tools in this space, simplify the process. Here’s how they’re different.

The main difference lies in their focus – Protopie prioritizes user-friendly simplicity, while Figma stands out with collaborative capabilities, reflecting diverse approaches to prototyping in the dynamic design ecosystem.

Protopie vs. Figma: Key Features Compared

Let’s summarize the key features using a table.

Key FeaturesProtopieFigma
User-Friendliness✔ Simple and Intuitive✔ Collaborative Design
Collaboration✔ Real-time Teamwork✔ Cloud-Based Collaboration
Animation Capabilities✔ Smooth Transitions✔ Interactive Prototyping
Interactivity✔ Easy Interaction Design✔ Prototyping with Components
Device Compatibility✔ Cross-Platform Support✔ Web-Based Design
Learning Curve✔ Quick to Grasp✔ Seamless Learning Curve

What is Protopie and How Does it Work?

Protopie, known for its simplicity, enables designers to create interactive prototypes effortlessly. Its user-friendly drag-and-drop interface ensures rapid prototyping.

Pros and Cons of Protopie:


  • Rapid Prototyping
  • User-Friendly Interface
  • Real-time Collaboration
  • Cross-Platform Support


  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
  • Limited Customization for Complex Designs

What is Figma and How Does it Work?

Figma, a collaborative design tool, emphasizes teamwork with its cloud-based platform. It allows designers to work together seamlessly in real-time.

Pros and Cons of Figma:


  • Collaborative Design
  • Cloud-Based Collaboration
  • Interactive Prototyping
  • Seamless Learning Curve


  • Learning Curve for Beginners
  • Limited Customization for Complex Designs

Protopie vs. Figma: Side-by-Side Comparison

Here’s a detailed comparison of the key features:


Protopie takes the lead in user-friendliness with its simple and intuitive interface. Ideal for beginners, it minimizes the learning curve, allowing users to swiftly navigate through the platform.

Its drag-and-drop functionality ensures that even those new to prototyping can quickly grasp the essentials. Protopie’s user-centric approach fosters a seamless transition from design to interactive prototype, making it a go-to choice for those prioritizing ease of use.

In contrast, Figma presents a user-friendly interface with a collaborative twist. While it caters to beginners, Figma’s emphasis lies in its cloud-based collaboration features.

This collaborative design platform ensures that multiple team members can work concurrently on a project, fostering real-time teamwork. Figma’s user-friendliness extends beyond individual ease of use to accommodate collaborative design environments seamlessly.


Protopie excels in collaboration with its seamless teamwork features. Multiple team members can work concurrently on a project, and real-time updates ensure everyone stays on the same page.

Protopie’s collaborative tools streamline the design process, making it an ideal choice for teams working on projects that require quick iterations and constant communication.

Figma takes collaboration a step further by synchronizing design and code. This feature fosters collaboration between designers and developers, ensuring a smooth transition from prototype to the development phase.

Figma’s collaboration features cater to projects where designers and developers work in tandem, bridging the gap between design and code seamlessly.

Animation Capabilities:

Protopie’s animation capabilities shine in its focus on smooth transitions and easy interaction design. It allows users to effortlessly create fluid animations, enhancing the user experience without delving into complex settings.

Protopie’s strength lies in its ability to simplify animation processes, making it accessible for designers aiming for effective and straightforward interactive designs.

Figma stands out with its animation capabilities, offering a dynamic range of features for interactive prototyping. Designers can create intricate animations, from micro-interactions to complex transitions, fostering a detailed and realistic preview of the final product.

Figma’s animation capabilities cater to those who seek versatility and precision in bringing designs to life with advanced animation sequences.


Protopie simplifies interactivity with its focus on user-friendly design. Designers can create interactive elements without extensive coding, making it accessible for users of varying experience levels.

Protopie’s strength lies in its ability to streamline the process of adding interactive components, ensuring designers can focus on creating engaging user experiences without grappling with complex configurations.

Figma elevates interactivity with its emphasis on prototyping with components. Designers can create interactive elements with versatility, using components to ensure consistency across various screens and interactions. Figma’s interactivity features cater to projects where a unified design system and dynamic components play a crucial role in delivering a seamless user experience.

Device Compatibility:

Protopie stands out with its cross-platform support, allowing designers to create prototypes that seamlessly run on various devices. Whether the project targets mobile, web, or desktop platforms, Protopie ensures consistency in the user experience across different devices. Its versatility makes it a preferred choice for projects with diverse platform requirements.

Figma focuses on native mobile prototyping, providing designers with tools specifically crafted for mobile platforms. While it may have a more specialized approach, Figma’s emphasis on native mobile prototyping ensures that designers can create prototypes tailored to the intricacies of mobile interfaces. It’s an ideal choice for projects with a primary focus on mobile user experiences.

Learning Curve:

Protopie maintains a quick learning curve, making it accessible for beginners. Designers can swiftly grasp the basics and start prototyping without the need for extensive training. Protopie’s user-friendly approach allows designers to focus more on their creative ideas and less on the intricacies of the tool.

Figma presents a steeper learning curve, requiring users to invest time in understanding its advanced features and customization options. While it may pose a challenge for beginners, Figma rewards users with a powerful set of tools for those willing to delve into the intricacies of the platform. It’s a choice for designers seeking to master a more sophisticated prototyping environment.


Protopie offers affordable plans catering to individual designers, teams, and enterprise-level needs. With various pricing tiers, users can choose a plan that aligns with their project requirements and budget constraints. Protopie’s pricing structure ensures accessibility for a wide range of users, making it an inclusive choice for different budgets.

Figma’s pricing varies, providing options for individuals, teams, and enterprises. While it offers a free plan, the paid plans unlock advanced features and customization options. Figma’s varied pricing plans cater to designers with diverse project needs, ensuring flexibility for different budget ranges.

Protopie Use Cases:

  1. Mobile App Onboarding: Protopie proves indispensable for creating captivating mobile app onboarding experiences. Designers leverage its intuitive interface to prototype seamless onboarding flows, guiding users through key features. For instance, a finance app could use Protopie to simulate a user-friendly onboarding journey, allowing users to interact with account setup steps and financial tools before the app’s actual development.
  2. E-learning Course Interaction: In the realm of e-learning, Protopie excels in crafting interactive course modules. Designers use it to prototype engaging interactions, from quizzes to multimedia content. For instance, an e-learning platform could employ Protopie to create a prototype showcasing interactive lessons, allowing users to navigate through course materials with ease before the content is fully developed.

Figma Use Cases:

  1. Collaborative Website Redesign: Figma’s strength shines in collaborative website redesign projects. Design teams work seamlessly on a cloud-based platform, allowing for real-time collaboration. For example, a design agency could use Figma to prototype a website redesign, enabling designers to collaborate on wireframes, UI elements, and design iterations simultaneously, fostering efficient teamwork.
  2. Interactive Design System: Figma proves invaluable for developing comprehensive design systems with interactive components. Designers can prototype reusable elements, ensuring consistency across various interfaces. For instance, a tech company could utilize Figma to prototype an interactive design system, allowing designers to showcase how interactive components behave and ensuring a unified user experience across different products.

9. Protopie Pricing: Protopie’s pricing structure offers individual, team, and enterprise plans, ensuring flexibility for diverse project and budget needs.

10. Figma Pricing: Figma provides individual, team, and enterprise plans with varied features. Its pricing accommodates different scales of design operations.

What to Consider When Choosing Between Protopie and Figma

Here are some essential factors to keep in mind when choosing a prototyping tool:

Project Complexity:

  • Protopie:
    • Ideal for projects with a moderate level of complexity.
    • Well-suited for quick iterations and prototyping of straightforward designs.
    • Particularly effective for projects where simplicity and rapid development are priorities.
  • Figma:
    • Tailored for projects demanding a high level of complexity.
    • Best suited for intricate designs and sophisticated interactions.
    • Offers advanced features that empower designers to handle complex animation sequences and detailed user interactions.
  • Choose Protopie for projects with straightforward design needs and a focus on rapid prototyping.
  • Opt for Figma when dealing with projects requiring intricate details, complex animations, and advanced customization.

Learning Curve:

  • Protopie:
    • Boasts a quick learning curve, making it accessible to beginners.
    • Designed for users who prioritize ease of use and a user-friendly interface.
  • Figma:
    • Involves a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and customization options.
    • Suited for designers willing to invest time in mastering a more sophisticated prototyping environment.
  • Opt for Protopie if you’re new to prototyping or prefer a tool with minimal learning curve.
  • Choose Figma if you’re an experienced designer looking for a tool that provides extensive customization options, even if it requires a learning investment.

Team Collaboration:

  • Protopie:
    • Strong emphasis on collaboration with real-time teamwork features.
    • Suitable for projects where multiple team members need to collaborate seamlessly.
  • Figma:
    • Takes collaboration a step further with design and code synchronization.
    • Ideal for projects where designers and developers work closely together.
  • Opt for Protopie if your project involves a design team that needs real-time collaboration.
  • Choose Figma when collaboration between designers and developers is a critical aspect of your project.

Platform Compatibility:

  • Protopie:
    • Offers cross-platform support, making it versatile for various devices and platforms.
    • Well-suited for projects targeting multiple platforms such as mobile, web, and desktop.
  • Figma:
    • Focuses on native mobile prototyping, providing specialized tools for mobile platforms.
    • Ideal for projects with a primary focus on creating native mobile user experiences.
  • Choose Protopie for projects requiring versatility across different platforms.
  • Opt for Figma when the primary focus is on creating native mobile prototypes with intricate interactions.

Budget Considerations:

  • Protopie:
    • Offers affordable plans catering to individual designers, teams, and enterprises.
    • Provides flexibility with various pricing tiers to accommodate different budget ranges.
  • Figma:
    • Pricing varies with options for individuals, teams, and enterprises.
    • While a free plan is available, the paid plans unlock advanced features, catering to diverse budget considerations.
  • Opt for Protopie if you’re looking for a cost-effective solution with plans suitable for individual designers or small teams.
  • Choose Figma if you have a flexible budget and require advanced features that come with paid plans.

Design Workflow Preferences:

  • Protopie:
    • Focused on simplicity and rapid prototyping, making it suitable for designers who prioritize efficiency.
    • Appeals to designers who prefer a straightforward design-to-prototype workflow.
  • Figma:
    • Offers advanced customization options, catering to designers who seek detailed control over every element.
    • Attracts designers with a preference for a more sophisticated and intricate design workflow.
  • Opt for Protopie if your design workflow emphasizes simplicity and efficiency.
  • Choose Figma if you prefer a design workflow that involves detailed customization and intricate control over design elements.


  1. Is Protopie suitable for collaborative design?
    • Protopie focuses on rapid prototyping and real-time collaboration.
  2. Can Figma be used for simple prototypes?
    • Yes, Figma’s versatility caters to both simple and complex design needs.
  3. Does Protopie support cloud-based collaboration?
    • Protopie’s collaboration features are real-time, not cloud-based.
  4. Is Figma better for web-based designs?
    • Figma’s web-based capabilities make it a great choice for web design projects.

Is Protopie Better Than Figma: Takeaway

Choose Protopie for user-friendly simplicity and rapid prototyping.

Opt for Figma when collaborative design and cloud-based teamwork are paramount. Each tool has its strengths, catering to specific design needs and team dynamics.