Figma is primarily designed to help you with comprehensive design projects, UI/UX work, and intricate prototypes.
FigJam is ideal for collaborative brainstorming, remote team ideation, and simplified whiteboarding.
Before we dive into this Figma vs. Figjam comparison, let’s know the main difference:
The main difference is that Figma is a comprehensive design and prototyping tool, catering to intricate design projects with extensive capabilities, while FigJam is a specialized platform focusing on collaborative whiteboarding and creative discussions.
Figma excels in UI/UX design, offering features for animation and interactive prototypes, while FigJam is tailored for brainstorming and remote collaboration with a simplified set of design tools.
Figma vs FigJam: Key Features Compared:
|Free Tier Available
What is Figma and How Does It Work?
Figma is a powerful design and prototyping tool, widely recognized for its collaborative features.
It provides an extensive suite of design capabilities, making it a go-to choice for UI/UX designers, product teams, and creatives.
Figma’s real-time editing and cloud-based platform enable seamless collaboration and version control, streamlining the design process.
Pros of Figma:
- Extensive design capabilities.
- Real-time collaboration for teams.
- Robust prototyping features.
Cons of Figma:
- Complexity for beginners.
- Subscription-based pricing.
What is FigJam and How Does It Work?
FigJam is Figma’s sibling platform, specifically tailored for real-time whiteboarding and collaboration.
While FigJam inherits Figma’s collaborative essence, it simplifies the design process, focusing on brainstorming, ideation, and collaborative discussions.
FigJam’s intuitive interface and specialized tools make it an excellent choice for remote teams engaging in creative collaboration.
Pros of FigJam:
- Simplified design tools.
- Advanced whiteboarding features.
- Free access available.
Cons of FigJam:
- Limited design capabilities.
- Specialized use, not a full design tool.
Figma vs FigJam: Side-by-Side Comparison
Figma leads in collaborative design, allowing team members to work simultaneously on projects. Real-time editing, comments, and version history streamline collaboration.
This extensive collaborative environment is especially beneficial for design-centric projects requiring intricate teamwork and continuous feedback.
FigJam focuses on collaborative whiteboarding, providing a space for teams to brainstorm and discuss ideas in real-time.
While collaboration remains a core feature, FigJam’s emphasis is on creative discussions and ideation rather than in-depth design projects.
2. Design Capabilities:
Figma stands out for its extensive design capabilities, encompassing vector editing, prototyping, and design system management.
It caters to UI/UX designers and teams engaged in comprehensive design projects, offering a robust suite of tools.
FigJam simplifies design tools, concentrating on basic shapes and annotations. It is more suitable for creative collaboration and discussions, lacking the depth of design features compared to Figma.
3. Real-Time Editing:
Both Figma and FigJam support real-time editing, allowing team members to collaborate seamlessly.
Edits made by one team member are instantly visible to others, fostering a dynamic collaborative environment.
FigJam, like Figma, supports real-time editing, ensuring that changes made during brainstorming sessions or collaborative discussions are reflected instantly for all participants.
Figma excels in prototyping with features for creating interactive and animated prototypes. It is ideal for UI/UX designers looking to visualize and test user flows within their designs.
FigJam offers limited prototyping capabilities, focusing more on collaborative whiteboarding than interactive design.
It may not be as feature-rich for creating complex interactive prototypes compared to Figma.
While Figma has basic whiteboarding features, it is not the primary focus of the platform.
Whiteboarding in Figma is more aligned with annotating designs during the collaboration process.
FigJam is a specialized whiteboarding platform, offering advanced features for brainstorming, mind mapping, and collaborative discussions. It serves as a dedicated space for creative collaboration.
Figma provides design-centric templates, catering to a wide range of design projects. Templates include UI kits, wireframes, and design system components, enhancing the efficiency of design workflows.
FigJam templates are more collaboration-focused, providing frameworks for brainstorming sessions, mind maps, and collaborative planning.
Templates are tailored for creative discussions rather than intricate design projects.
Figma boasts an extensive array of integrations with third-party tools and plugins, enhancing its functionality for design teams. Integrations cover areas such as project management, prototyping, and design assets.
FigJam’s integrations are growing but are currently more limited compared to Figma.
While it supports integrations for collaborative tools, it may not have the same breadth of third-party connections as Figma.
What to Consider When Choosing Between Figma and FigJam
When deciding between Figma and FigJam, consider the following:
1. Project Type:
- Figma: Ideal for comprehensive design projects requiring extensive design capabilities and prototyping.
- FigJam: Suited for creative collaboration, brainstorming, and discussions, especially in remote or distributed teams.
2. Collaboration Needs:
- Figma: Best for design-centric collaboration with a focus on in-depth projects and prototyping.
- FigJam: Tailored for collaborative whiteboarding and ideation sessions, providing a creative space for discussions.
3. Design Complexity:
- Figma: Suitable for projects demanding intricate design work, animations, and interactive prototypes.
- FigJam: Designed for simplicity, more focused on basic design tools and collaborative discussions.
4. Cost Considerations:
- Figma: Operates on a subscription model with tiered pricing. Advanced features are available in paid plans.
- FigJam: Offers free access, making it more accessible for teams with budget considerations.
Figma Real-World Use Case Examples
1. Designing a Mobile App Interface:
In a real-world scenario, a design team is tasked with creating a user-friendly interface for a new mobile app.
Leveraging Figma’s extensive design capabilities, the team collaboratively works on wireframes, high-fidelity designs, and interactive prototypes.
The real-time editing feature enables designers to make simultaneous updates, receive instant feedback, and iterate swiftly.
Figma’s design system management ensures consistency across screens, streamlining the entire design process. The team utilizes Figma’s prototype testing to simulate user interactions, ensuring a seamless and intuitive experience for app users.
2. Collaborative Website Redesign:
An agency working on a client’s website redesign project employs Figma for seamless collaboration.
Designers, developers, and project managers collaborate in real-time to iterate on the website’s visual elements, layout, and user experience.
Figma’s extensive library of UI kits and design components accelerates the design process.
Designers create responsive designs, and the team uses Figma’s prototyping features to visualize user journeys.
The version history feature ensures that the team can review and revert to previous designs, maintaining a transparent and organized workflow.
FigJam Real World Use Cases
1. Remote Team Brainstorming Session:
In a distributed team environment, FigJam becomes the virtual whiteboard for a brainstorming session.
Team members from different locations collaborate in real-time, sharing ideas, sketching diagrams, and organizing thoughts.
FigJam’s focus on simplicity allows team members to quickly add sticky notes, draw sketches, and create mind maps.
The advanced whiteboarding features, such as cursor tracking and emojis, enhance the collaborative experience, fostering creativity in a remote setting. The session results in a visually structured plan for an upcoming project.
2. Agile Sprint Planning:
A software development team adopts FigJam for Agile sprint planning. The team gathers virtually to plan upcoming tasks, user stories, and priorities for the sprint.
FigJam’s templates for Agile frameworks provide a structured canvas for organizing tasks and dependencies.
Team members contribute asynchronously, adding comments, sketches, and feedback directly on the FigJam board.
The visual representation aids in transparent communication, ensuring that every team member has a clear understanding of the sprint goals.
FigJam’s specialized focus on collaborative planning enhances the efficiency of Agile ceremonies, even in a remote work setup.
1. Can I use Figma for collaborative whiteboarding like FigJam?
- While Figma has basic whiteboarding features, FigJam is specialized for collaborative whiteboarding with advanced tools tailored for brainstorming and discussions.
2. Is FigJam suitable for intricate design projects?
- FigJam is more geared towards collaborative discussions and whiteboarding. For comprehensive design projects, Figma with its extensive design capabilities is a better choice.
3. Do both Figma and FigJam support real-time editing?
- Yes, both platforms support real-time editing, allowing team members to collaborate seamlessly.
4. Are there limitations to the free plans on Figma and FigJam?
- Figma offers a free tier with basic features, while FigJam provides free access for collaborative whiteboarding. Advanced features may require a subscription on both platforms.
Is Figma Better Than FigJam: Takeaway
Figma excels in comprehensive design projects, offering extensive design capabilities, prototyping features, and a wide array of templates.
It is the go-to choice for UI/UX designers and design teams engaged in intricate projects.
FigJam specializes in collaborative whiteboarding, providing a simplified space for brainstorming, ideation, and creative discussions.
It is particularly valuable for remote teams seeking a dedicated platform for collaborative planning and creative sessions.
Consider the nature of your projects, the level of design complexity needed, and your team’s collaboration preferences when making a decision between Figma and FigJam.